Cases 21 - 30 of 93
FANNING v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2019cv00431
Defendant:
CAMERON JOHNSON and LINDA JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
VICTORIA FANNING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ORTIZ v. FAN BISTRO RESTAURANT INC. et al
as 2:2018cv17437
Defendant:
FAN BISTRO RESTAURANT INC., FENG LIU and LENA LIU
Plaintiff:
JOHN ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
FANNING v. ADVANCED FAMILY PRACTICE, P.C. et al
as 5:2018cv03388
Defendant:
CAROL S. STRUMINGER and ADVANCED FAMILY PRACTICE, P.C.
Plaintiff:
LAURA FANNING
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7434
Palmitessa v. Lackawanna County et al
as 3:2018cv01462
Defendant:
Loreen Cummings, Robert Eagen, John/Jane Doe County Employees I-X and others
Plaintiff:
Nicole Palmitessa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ABDUR-RAHEEM v. LANIGAN et al
as 3:2018cv10390
Plaintiff:
SHAMSIDDIN ABDUR-RAHEEM
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, JOHN FALVEY, LINDA SANTORO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parchinski v. Lackawanna County et al
as 3:2018cv00700
Plaintiff:
Shannon Marie Parchinski
Defendant:
Lackawanna County , Vincent Mooney , Robert McMillen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FANNING v. GEN-CON EXCAVATING, INC.
as 2:2017mc00177
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. FANNING
Defendant:
GEN-CON EXCAVATING, INC.
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Type:
Other Statutes
WHITNEY-WILLIAMS v. CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORR. FAC. et al
as 2:2017cv04359
Plaintiff:
TYERICK NICHEED WHITNEY-WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORR. FAC., MICHAEL FANNING, HOLLY J. FORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FANNING v. PRIME NDT SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2017mc00157
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. FANNING
Defendant:
PRIME NDT SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Type:
Other Statutes
FAN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv05659
Plaintiff:
SHARON FAN
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
