Cases 21 - 29 of 29
LAM v. PASSAIC COUNTY et al
as 2:2008cv05598
Plaintiff:
FONG SAU LAM
Defendant:
PASSAIC COUNTY, PASSAIC COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, PASSAIC COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv05313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
REED v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2008cv03325
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM REED
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, J'NEAN CASERTA, TIFFANY RICHARDSON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MCCRACKEN v. BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES, LLC et al
as 2:2008cv02934
Plaintiff:
TED A. MCCRACKEN
Defendant:
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES, LLC, JEFFERSON SCIENCE ASSOCIATES, LLC, OAK RIDGE ASSOCIATED UNIVERSITIES INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
CORTEZ v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2008cv02657
Plaintiff:
WILFREDO CORTEZ
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JOSEPH COONEY, EDWARD HAYS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MCCRACKEN v. MCNEIL et al
as 2:2007cv04097
Plaintiff:
TED MCCRACKEN
Defendant:
JANET A. MCNEIL, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, NANCY SHAHEEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCCRACKEN v. EXELON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv02038
Plaintiff:
TED A. MCCRACKEN
Defendant:
EXELON CORPORATION, CORBIN A. MCNEIL, CHRISTOPHER CRANE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
HARRIS et al v. EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv00403
Plaintiff:
LAURANCE E. HARRIS, ERIN E. HARRIS and ERIN E. HARRIS
Defendant:
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
SHANNON v. EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv00404
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. SHANNON
Defendant:
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
