Cases 21 - 30 of 88
Raul v. Turgeon et al
as 1:2022cv00571
Plaintiff:
Tammy Raul
Defendant:
Joseph W. Turgeon, Kurt A. Gustafson, Francois Lebel and others
Nominal Defendant:
Spectrum Pharmaceuticals Inc.
UNITED MERCHANT SERVICES, INC. v. ROYAL WESTERN COMPUTER, INC et al
as 2:2022cv02199
Plaintiff:
UNITED MERCHANT SERVICES, INC. and BLUU, INC
Defendant:
ROYAL WESTERN COMPUTER, INC, TOMORROW POS, INC and JONG SOO LIM
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
v. ROYAL WESTERN COMPUTER, INC et al
as 1:2022cv02199
Plaintiff:
United Merchant Services, Inc. and BLUU, INC
Defendant:
ROYAL WESTERN COMPUTER, INC, TOMORROW POS, INC, Jong Soo LIM and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
TORRES v. ROYAL SOVEREIGN INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01686
Defendant:
Royal Sovereign International, Inc. and T.K. LIM
Plaintiff:
JOHN TORRES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GEIGER et al v. SABOR LATINO RESTAURANT, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv01513
Plaintiff:
INA SCHNITZER, DENISE MILANI, MARKETA LIM and others
Defendant:
SABOR LATINO RESTAURANT, INC. and ANGEL AVILA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Olaniyan Adefumi v. Sharon Lim
as 20-1192
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OLANIYAN ADEFUMI
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. SHARON LIM
Franchi v. Empire Resorts, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01947
Defendant:
Nancy A. Palumbo, Keith Horn, Empire Resorts, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Franchi
Olaniyan Adefumi v. Sharon Lim
as 19-1764
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OLANIYAN ADEFUMI
Defendant / Appellee:
SHARON LIM
THOMPSON v. NEWARK BETH ISRAEL HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2019cv09102
Defendant:
DR. LIM, DR. COHEN and NEWARK BETH ISRAEL HOSPITAL
Plaintiff:
JOEL THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LIM v. BEAUTY TOWN INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv16972
Plaintiff:
YONG NAM LIM
Defendant:
DON PARK and BEAUTY TOWN INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
