Cases 21 - 30 of 50
JACKSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2019cv03560
Defendant:
MS. BESTEDO, CHRISTINE NELSON, DR. ODEIDA DALMASI and others
Plaintiff:
TERENCE D. JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLECTION AGENCY, INC., CUSTOMER DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION
as 2:2019md02904
Defendant:
OPTUM360, LLC, QUEST DIAGNOSTIC INCORPORATED, LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS and others
Plaintiff:
JORGE M FERNANDEZ, JR., FRANCIS CARBONNEAU, MARK JOHNSTON and others
In Re:
AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLECTION AGENCY, INC., CUSTOMER DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Ashley Jilek and LaTorrie Glover-Brown
Special Master:
HON. MARK FALK, USMJ (RET.)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
REED v. MARLER et al
as 2:2019cv02355
Respondent:
PATRICIA K. CUSHWA and SEAN MARLER
Petitioner:
ROBERT ANDREW REED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GANT v. MARLER et al
as 2:2019cv00043
Defendant:
JEFFREY NASH, MICHAEL W. CARROLL, MRS. KNOX and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH GANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANDERS v. MARLER et al
as 2:2018cv05477
Defendant:
R. SMITH, SPECIAL INVESTIGATIVE SECTION/SERVICES (S.I.S.) DEPT. AND STAFF, WARDEN SEAN MARLER and others
Plaintiff:
ROCMON L. SANDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THORNTON v. MARLER
as 2:2018cv03244
Respondent:
SEAN MARLER
Petitioner:
DWAINE THORNTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
EFUNNUGA v. SEAN
as 2:2018cv01386
Petitioner:
OLUTOKUNBO EFUNNUGA
Respondent:
SEAN MARLER and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BRISTOL v. MARLER
as 2:2018cv01125
Petitioner:
JACK R. BRISTOL
Respondent:
SEAN MARLER and U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
REESE v. MARLER
as 2:2018cv00902
Petitioner:
TROY M. REESE
Respondent:
SEAN MARLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PROFFITT v. MARLER
as 2:2018cv00705
Petitioner:
WILBERT EUGENE PROFFITT
Respondent:
SEAN MARLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
