Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Ivan Mendez et al v Warden Perry Phelps
as 1:2013cv02070
Petitioner:
Ivan L. Mendez, Stephanie Parsons and Robert Long
Respondent:
Perry Phelps and Attorney General of State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mendez, et al v. Phelps
as 1:2013cv01134
Plaintiff:
Ivan L. Mendez, Stephanie Parsons, Robert Long and others
Defendant:
Perry Phelps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parson v. Phelps et al
as 1:2012cv01338
Petitioner:
Ernest Parson
Respondent:
Perry Phelps and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Desmond et al v. Phelps et al
as 1:2012cv01120
Plaintiff:
Abdul-Mafidh as Salafi, Christopher Desmond, Idris Young and others
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, David Pierce, James Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sealed Defendant v. USA
as 1:2012cv01056
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
William Parson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Delaware Coalition for Open Government Inc. v. Strine et al
as 1:2011cv01015
Plaintiff:
Delaware Coalition for Open Government Inc.
Defendant:
Leo E. Strine, Jr. , John W. Noble , Donald F. Parsons, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hurst v. Benton Counselman et al
as 1:2010cv00899
Plaintiff:
Jerry A. Hurst
Defendant:
Benton Counselman, Jeffrey Horvath, Steven Getek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Shankaras v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00828
Plaintiff:
Roman Shankaras
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll, Rick Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shankaras v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00829
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll, Rick Kearney and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickens et al v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00786
Plaintiff:
Kevin L. Dickens, Roman Shankaras and Thomas Gordon
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll, Rick Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
