Cases 21 - 30 of 168
Muircroft v. Resonant Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00341
Plaintiff:
Gregory Muircroft
Defendant:
Resonant Inc., George B. Holmes, Michael Fox and others
RUFF v. RESONANT INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00861
Plaintiff:
BENNY RUFF
Defendant:
RESONANT INC., GEORGE B HOLMES, MICHAEL FOX and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
RANKIN v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2021cv00215
Plaintiff:
LARRY KERMIT RANKIN
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, FACILITY MANAGER ERIC TICE, LIEUTENANT MICHAEL CINKO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RANKIN v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2021cv00220
Plaintiff:
LARRY KERMIT RANKIN, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, SUPERINTENDENT ERIE TICE, LIEUTENANT MICHAEL CINKO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RANKIN v. PTC GROUP HOLDINGS LLC et al
as 2:2021cv01321
Plaintiff:
THOMAS P. RANKIN
Defendant:
PTC GROUP HOLDINGS LLC, PTC ALLIANCE LLC, PTC ALLIANCE HOLDINGS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
BRENGLE et al v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.
as 2:2021cv01300
Plaintiff:
BILL BRENGLE, SANDRA BROWN, GREGORY BYRGE and others
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC and PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EASLEY v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2021cv00251
Plaintiff:
WARREN EASLEY
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, OBERLANDER, SARATELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MITCHELL v. SCI SMITHFIELD et al
as 1:2021cv01665
Plaintiff:
Juwan Mitchell
Defendant:
SCI Smithfield, Rankin, Andrew Low and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MITCHELL v. SCI SMITHFIELD et al
as 1:2021cv01664
Plaintiff:
Juwan Mitchell
Defendant:
SCI Smithfield, Andrew Low, Joe Rankin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RANKINS v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03653
Plaintiff:
SHARON RANKINS
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC. and MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
