Cases 21 - 30 of 37
BORRERO v. GLUNT et al
as 3:2012cv00153
Plaintiff:
HECTOR BORRERO
Defendant:
STEVEN R. GLUNT, D. CLOSE, DAVID KESSLING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BORRERO v. HORTON et al
as 3:2012cv00113
Plaintiff:
HECTOR BORRERO
Defendant:
JEFF HORTON, KENNETH R. HOLLIBAUGH, J. W. SAWTELLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caine Pelzer v. Kevin Shea, et al
as 11-4644
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CAINE PELZER
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN SHEA and ROBERT REED
GENTILQUORE v. YOUNKIIN, et al.
as 3:2011cv00255
Defendant:
DEBRA J. YOUNKIN, JANET PEARSON, ROBERT REED and others
Plaintiff:
DARREN R. GENTILQUORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gentilquore v. Younkin et al
as 3:2011cv01946
Defendant:
Debra J Younkin, Janet Pearson, Robert Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Darren R. Gentilquore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAGAN v. SMEAL et al
as 3:2011cv00232
Plaintiff:
DAMONT HAGAN
Defendant:
SHIRLEY SMEAL, SCOTT BUCHANAN, RANDLE BRITTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
PELZER v. LT. KEVIN SHEA et al
as 3:2011cv00185
Plaintiff:
CAINE PELZER
Defendant:
LT. KEVIN SHEA and ROBERT REED
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY v. SUPERINTENDENT CAMERON et al
as 3:2010cv00203
Plaintiff:
DONALD MURPHY
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT CAMERON, SECURITY CAPTAIN PIRIZOLLA, SECURITY LT. HOFFMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCBURNETT, et al v. AC AND S, INC.(ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), et al
as 2:2010cv63516
Plaintiff:
SYLVIA J. MCBURNETT , J.C. MCBURNETT , CAROLYN COUNTS and others
Defendant:
AC AND S, INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), ASBESTOSPRAY CORP., FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REED et al v. U.S. RUBBER COMPANY (UNIROYAL)
as 2:2009cv86942
Plaintiff:
ROBERT REED and SONJA REED
Defendant:
U.S. RUBBER COMPANY (UNIROYAL)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
