Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 45
County of Northumberland v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 4:2019cv00945
Defendant: Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Indivior, Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff: County of Northumberland
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
HOWELL v. H&M HENNES & MAURITZ, LP
as 2:2016cv06241
Plaintiff: AARON HOWELL
Defendant: H&M HENNES & MAURITZ, LP and TN II LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-3617
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Gursheel Dhillon, et al v. Endo Pharmaceuticals, et al
as 15-2792
Plaintiff - Appellant: GURSHEEL S. DHILLON, on behalf of the United States of America and all Health Related Plans that purchased Lidoderm and cash payers
Plaintiff - Appellee: MAX H. WEATHERSBY, JR., ex rel. On behalf of the states of CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, HI, IL, IN, LA, MD, MI, MN, MT, NV, NJ, NM, NY, NC, OK, RI, TN, TX, VA, WI, and the DC. and MK LITIGATION PARTNERSHIP 2011 LLP, ex rel. On behalf of the states of CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, HI, IL, IN, LA, MD, MI, MN, MT, NV, NJ, NM, NY, NC, OK, RI, TN, TX, VA, WI, and the DC.
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee: ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS, PEGGY RYAN, ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS INC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv04521
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Gursheel Dhillon, et al v. Endo Pharmaceuticals, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-3377
Plaintiff - Appellant: GURSHEEL S. DHILLON, On behalf of the United States of America and all Health Related Plans that purchased Lidoderm and cash payers
Plaintiff - Appellee: MAX H. WEATHERSBY, JR., ex rel., On behalf of the States of CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, HI, IL, IN, LA, MD, MI, MN, MT, NV, NJ, NM, NY, NC, OK, RI, TN, TX, VA, WI and the D.C., MK LITIGATION PARTNERSHIP 2011 LLP, ex. rel. On behalf of the states of CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, HI, IL, IN, LA, MD, MI, MN, MT, NV, NJ, NM, NY, NC, OK, RI, TN, TX, VA, WI, and the D.C. and PEGGY RYAN, United States of America ex rel. Peggy Ryan, States of: FL, NY, MA, CA, VA, DE, IL, NV, GA, HI, IN, MT, NH, NJ, NM, OK, RI, TEN, TX
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee: ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS, ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS INC, ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS HOLDINGS INC and others
Derrick Godfrey v. Larry Thompson
as 14-2975
Plaintiff - Appellant: DERRICK GODFREY, /TN: Thurman D. Nelson
Defendant - Appellee: LARRY THOMPSON, CHARLES S. NABER, JULIO M. ALGARIN, Assistant Warden and others
Fiorani et al v. Chrysler Group, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00416
Plaintiff: Ross A. Fiorani and States Attorney Generals in: CA, OH, PA, MD, WVA, DE, NJ, NY, TN, NC, SC, and FL
Defendant: Chrysler Group, LLC, Dodge Corp., TD Financial Group, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Paetec Communications Inc, et al v. MCI Comm Services, et al
as 11-2568
Plaintiff - Appellee: PAETEC COMMUNICATIONS INC
Plaintiff - Numerous Parties See Appellee: PAETEC COMMUNICATIONS OF VA INC, US LEC COMM INC, d/b/a Paetec Business Services, US LEC OF PA, d/b/a Paetec Business Services and others
Defendant - Appellant: MCI COMM SERVICES, D/B/A Verizon Business Services and VERIZON GLOBAL NETWORKS INC
Paetec Communications Inc, et al v. MCI Comm Services, et al
as 11-2569
Plaintiff - Appellant: PAETEC COMMUNICATIONS INC
Plaintiff - Numerous Parties See Appellant: US LEC OF VA, d/b/a Paetec Business Services, US LEC COMM INC, d/b/a Paetec Business Services, US LEC OF PA, d/b/a Paetec Business Services and others
Defendant - Appellee: MCI COMM SERVICES, D/B/A Verizon Business Services and VERIZON GLOBAL NETWORKS INC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?