Cases 21 - 30 of 1,741
Michael Coniker v. Apostolate for Family Consecration Inc
as 24-2310
Defendant:
APOSTOLATE FOR FAMILY CONSECRATION INC, an Ohio Corporation
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CONIKER
Intervenor:
JOSEPH E. HUDAK
Arbee v. FAMILY DOLLAR STORES, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv03156
Plaintiff:
Teresa Arbee
Defendant:
FAMILY DOLLAR STORES OF PENNSYLVANIA, LLC and FAMILY DOLLAR STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01035
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
BORING v. AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF COLUMBUS
as 2:2024cv02968
Defendant:
AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF COLUMBUS doing business as AFLAC
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BORING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00982
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-2180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
LEE v. PHILADELPHIA FAMILY COURT et al
as 2:2024cv02883
Plaintiff:
CHERIECE LEE
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA FAMILY COURT and FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENN. PHILADELPHIA PA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In Re: Request from Argentina
as 1:2024cv00759
Petitioner:
Family Court No. 4 of the Judicial District of San Isidro In San Isidro, Argentina
Respondent:
Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
David Jaroslawicz, et al v. M&T Bank Corp, et al
as 24-8025
Petitioner:
BELINA FAMILY and JEFF KRUBLIT
Respondent:
M&T BANK CORP, HUDSON CITY BANCORP INC, RENE F. JONES and others
David Jaroslawicz, et al v. M&T Bank Corp, et al
as 24-8024
Petitioner:
BELINA FAMILY and JEFF KRUBLIT
Respondent:
M&T BANK CORP, HUDSON CITY BANCORP INC, ROBERT G. WILMERS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
