Cases 21 - 30 of 35
JONES v. SMITH et al
as 2:2015cv02707
Plaintiff:
THOMAS WILLIAM JONES, III
Defendant:
SHIRLEY LAWS SMITH, CCS, MANAGEMENT SERVICES, ROSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv07373
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JONES
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA v. PLUMMER et al
as 2:2011cv06790
Plaintiff:
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RUTHIE MAE PLUMMER, SHAWN WILLIAMS and DAFNEY WILLIAMS JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
JONES v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2011cv04493
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JONES
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and JOHN DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv64345
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JONES and LIZZIE JONES
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv40167
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JONES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
BOURNE v. PRESIDENT JUDGE OF LANCASTER et al
as 5:2009cv04504
Plaintiff:
ROBERT M. BOURNE
Defendant:
PRESIDENT JUDGE OF LANCASTER, CRAIG STEDMAN, KAREN MANSFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. AFA PROTECTICE SYSTEMS, INC.
as 1:2009cv04472
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JONES
Defendant:
AFA PROTECTICE SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
JONES v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv76187
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JONES
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
USA v. David Jone
as 08-4100
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID WILLIAM JONES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
