Cases 21 - 30 of 226
SMITH v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2022cv05092
Plaintiff:
MATTHIAS WAGMAN, MACKENZIE SMITH, MICHAEL SMITH and others
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
BYNAGARI v. BLINKEN et al
as 2:2022cv06114
Plaintiff:
NARESH BABU BYNAGARI
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR MENDOZA JADDOU and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Larson et al v. Frederiksted Health Care, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Steven Larson and Debra Larson
Defendant:
Frederiksted Health Care, Inc., United States of America, Walter Pedersen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice
Sebagh v. Paucek et al
as 1:2022cv01205
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sebagh
Defendant:
Christopher J. Paucek, Mark J. Chernis, Harsha Mokkarala and others
Nominal Defendant:
2U, Inc.
Monteleone v. View, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00980
Nominal Defendant:
View, Inc. and CF Finance Acquisition Corp. II
Plaintiff:
James Monteleone
Defendant:
Rao Mulpuri, Vidul Prakash, Toby Cosgrove and others
Damidi v. View, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00675
Plaintiff:
Anil Damidi
Defendant:
Rao Mulpuri, Nigel Gormly, Harold Hughes and others
Nominal Defendant:
View, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01623
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
GEORGE v. LARSON DESIGN GROUP, INC.
as 2:2022cv00071
Plaintiff:
GERALD GEORGE
Defendant:
LARSON DESIGN GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Kent v. Rogers Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv01806
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
Rogers Corporation, Keith L. Barnes, Megan Faust and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
