Cases 31 - 40 of 114
BARKER v. FAYETTE COUNTY et al
as 2:2016cv01397
Plaintiff:
GEROGE A. BARKER
Defendant:
FAYETTE COUNTY, GARY BROWNFIELD, SR. and GARY BROWNFIELD, JR.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Jones v. Freese et al
as 4:2016cv00685
Plaintiff:
Shamel Leroy Jones
Defendant:
Heidi L. Freese, Timothy J. Barker and John S. Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RETAIL, WHOLESALE, DEPARTMENT STORE UNION LOCAL 1034 et al v. REST HAVEN NURSING CENTER
as 2:2015cv05990
Plaintiff:
RETAIL, WHOLESALE, DEPARTMENT STORE UNION LOCAL 1034 , RETAIL, WHOLESALE, DEPARTMENT STORE UNION LOCAL 1034 WELFARE TRUST FUND and GARY BARKER
Defendant:
REST HAVEN NURSING CENTER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Barker v. Kane
as 1:2015cv01924
Plaintiff:
James P Barker
Defendant:
Kathleen G. Kane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARKER v. ECKHARD et al
as 2:2015cv03644
Petitioner:
TERRENCE BARKER
Respondent:
J. A. ECKHARD, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DELAWARE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barker
as 1:2015cv00574
Plaintiff:
Aldon Barker
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
MILLER v. SERIOUS ENERGY, et al
as 2:2014cv01430
Plaintiff:
JO ANNE MILLER
Defendant:
KENSINGTON HPP, INC. , SERIOUS ENERGY , CHUCK WETMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
NEXIUM (ESOMEPRAZOLE) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 2:2014mc00225
Movant:
JEFFREY A. POTT , RICHARD S. BARKER , TERRI L. BOWMAN and others
Respondent:
ALL PLAINTIFFS IN IN RE NEXIUM (ESOMEPRAZOLE MAGNESIUM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION, MDL NO. 2409
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Type:
Other Statutes
LEWIS et al v. LAZERO
as 2:2014cv05304
Plaintiff:
RASHEED LEWIS and ANDRE BARKER
Defendant:
AUSTIN PAUL LAZERO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
