Cases 31 - 40 of 80
ALLEN et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05856
Plaintiff:
DONNA ALLEN , ERIC BAKER , MARY BATTLE and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RANDOLPH v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv04116
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL B. RANDOLPH, IV
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, JAY LANE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BATTLES v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2013cv00178
Petitioner:
RICKY BATTLES
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL and ROZUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BATTLE v. ASTRUE
as 2:2012cv04069
Plaintiff:
TRACY BATTLE
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
ROBINSON et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv03731
Plaintiff:
DAVE ROBINSON , BRIAN S. ALLEN , JAMES BETTERSON and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, NFL PROPERTIES LLC and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THURSTON v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM (P.P.S.) et al
as 2:2012cv00614
Plaintiff:
DARYL THURSTON
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM (P.P.S.), GIORLA, CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY (C.F.C.F.) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BATTLE v. CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2012cv00335
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BATTLE
Defendant:
CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BATTLE et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv66963
Plaintiff:
WILLIE A. BATTLE and DORETHA BATTLE
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BATTLE v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv66999
Plaintiff:
PEARLE A. BATTLE
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
