Cases 31 - 40 of 220
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jesse Keel v. Septa's Philadelphia Housing A, et al
as 21-2365
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESSE LEE KEEL
Defendant / Appellee:
SEPTA'S PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUHORITY C.L.S., C.B.H.I.C.M.S., PHILADELPHIA CITY'S C.B.H.S. and others
Debtor / Appellee:
TD BANK
Meghan Glasson v. Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania
as 21-2321
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MEGHAN GLASSON
Defendant / Appellee:
CITIZENS BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA
KEEL III v. SEPTA'S PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITYS C.L.S. et al
as 2:2021cv01843
Defendant:
TD BANK, C.B.H.I.C.M.S., PHILADELPHIA'S ARRESTING POLICE and others
Plaintiff:
JESSE LEE KEEL III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berroteran v. CIT Group Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00038
Defendant:
Dorene C. Dominguez, FC Merger Subsidiary IX, Inc., William M. Freeman and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Berroteran
ROSETT et al v. KEARNY BANK et al
as 2:2021cv00112
Defendant:
CITIZENS BANK, N.A., KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP., SAGE TITLE GROUP, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ROSETT and LESLEY SARLES
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 260
Thomas v. CIT Group Inc. et al.
as 1:2020cv01641
Defendant:
Dorene C. Dominguez, FC Merger Subsidiary IX, Inc., William M. Freeman and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Thomas
Ordonez v. CIT Group Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01586
Defendant:
Dorene C. Dominguez, FC Merger Subsidiary IX, Inc., William M. Freeman and others
Plaintiff:
Blake Ordonez
LAWSON v. LAWSON et al
as 2:2020cv05073
Defendant:
AMBER R. LAWSON, AMBER J. LAWSON, MAMIE J. LAWSON and others
Plaintiff:
LEMUEL LAWSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOHM v. CITIZENS SECURITIES INC. et al
as 2:2020cv01504
Defendant:
CITIZENS BANK, N.A. and CITIZENS SECURITIES INC.
Plaintiff:
KEITH LOHM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
