Cases 31 - 40 of 119
Ricky Whitney v. Curley, et al
as 12-3836
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY WHITNEY
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN CURLEY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
In re: Henry Stubbs, III
as 12-3286
Petitioner:
HENRY CHRISTOPHER STUBBS, III
Respondent:
MICHAEL CURLEY, Warden at MCF and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Nominal Respondent:
CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER
William Doxon v. Michael Curley, et al
as 12-3090
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM DOXON
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL W. CURLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Meyers et al v. Heffernan et al
as 3:2012cv02434
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MEYERS , DAVID RUNDELLA , DAVID BOSEFSKI and others
Defendant:
MITCHELL L HEFFERNAN and JAMES E PEDRICK
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Mitchell Heffernan and James Pedrick
Thirdparty_defendant:
Steven Patton and Paul Impagliazzo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Steven Otto v. Michael Curley, et al
as 12-1834
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN D. OTTO
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL CURLEY, MUSKEGON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY YORK COUNTY and others
Roulhac v. Lawler et al
as 1:2012cv00311
Plaintiff:
Paul Khalifah Roulhac
Defendant:
R. M. Lawler, Mary Lou Showalter, Shoaf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Drawbaugh v. Secretary Department of Correc, et al
as 12-1218
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL DRAWBAUGH
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MICHAEL W. CURLEY, PA ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Lance Rucker v. Michael Curley
as 11-4617
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LANCE RUCKER
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL CURLEY, DA ALLEGHENY COUNTY and ATTY GEN PA
James Jones v. Michael Curley, et al
as 11-3207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES RAY JONES, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL CURLEY, DA PHILADELPHIA and ATTY GEN PA
MCCORMICK v. SCI-GRATERFORD et al
as 2:2011cv05571
Plaintiff:
ANDREW MCCORMICK
Defendant:
SCI-GRATERFORD, ANDLY, ANDRESON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
