Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Charles Smith v. Donna Zickefoose
as 12-3134
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
DONNA ZICKEFOOSE
ABRAHAM et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv03716
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL D. ABRAHAM , TUNISIA ABRAHAM , HIRAM ALEX and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. ZICKEFOOSE
as 1:2012cv03270
Petitioner:
CHARLES SMITH
Respondent:
DONNA ZICKEFOOSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Charles Smith v. Marirosa Lama
as 11-4599
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
MARIROSA LAMAS, DA MONTGOMERY and ATTY GEN PA
SMITH v. PHILADELPHIA PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE et al
as 2:2011cv06867
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SMITH
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, R. SETH WILLIAMS, PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM/PPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. PROSECUTORS OFFICE OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY et al
as 2:2011cv06483
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SMITH
Defendant:
PROSECUTORS OFFICE OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, LOUIS GIORLA, MICHAEL NUTTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv48623
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SMITH
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SMITH v. CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2011cv03387
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SMITH
Defendant:
CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv02194
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SMITH
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2011cv01830
Petitioner:
CHARLES SMITH
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
