Cases 31 - 40 of 15,491
HAYNES v. O'MALLEY
as 5:2024cv04169
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
DAVID L. HAYNES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bethune v. Iagavino et al
as 1:2024cv01364
Defendant:
D.S.C.S. Nicklow, Correctional Officer Iagavino, C.H.C.A. Jon Altimus and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Julian Bethune
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. HARRY et al
as 3:2024cv00194
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, C.O. GALLAHER, LUCAS MALISHCHAK and others
Plaintiff:
JAHQUILL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MESHKOFSKI v. DOCTOR SPANISH et al
as 1:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
DAVID MESHKOFSKI
Defendant:
DOCTOR SPANISH and NURISE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Su v. Caf del Sol Chambersburg LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01344
Defendant:
Cafe del Sol Chambersburg LLC and David Juarez
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00193
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
WHIPPLE v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2024cv04037
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, INC.
Plaintiff:
DAVID WHIPPLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Szydlowski v. NOVO NORDISK INC. et al
as 2:2024cv04080
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
David Szydlowski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
XU v. BILAL et al
as 2:2024cv04113
Defendant:
JEFFREY HANS, DETECTIVE JOSEPH FARGNOLI, ROCHELLE BILAL and others
Plaintiff:
LIRON XU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
HUDGINS v. BUBERNIAK
as 2:2024cv01138
Plaintiff:
Kendalynn M. Hudgins
Defendant:
David J. Buberniak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
