Cases 31 - 40 of 73
USA v. Maximo Espinosa
as 17-3616
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MAXIMO ESPINOSA
NORTHEAST REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS, NORTHEAST CARPENTERS FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF v. THE ESPINOSA GROUP, INC.
as 2:2017cv07610
Respondent:
THE ESPINOSA GROUP, INC.
Petitioner:
NORTHEAST REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS, NORTHEAST CARPENTERS FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv04594
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv04595
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ESPINOSA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv03607
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
MAXIMO ESPINOSA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
STODDART et al v. NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2016cv03031
Plaintiff:
FAY STODDART , VILMA ORTIZ , AUDREY SAMUELS and others
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY , JOHN DOES 1-10 and XYZ CORP. 1-10
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
SPECTOR et al v. CHRISTIE et al
as 2:2016cv02692
Plaintiff:
IDA L. SPECTOR , RONDA L. GAMEZ , LILLIAN HENNEGAN and others
Defendant:
THAI CHRISTIE, THE LAW OFFICE OF TOMAS ESPINOSA, ESQ., TOMAS ESPINOSA and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
ESPINOSA et al v. CAREFUL SHIRTS, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv01429
Plaintiff:
APOLONIO ESPINOSA , MINERVA OLMEDO and CARLOS ESPINOSA URAGA
Defendant:
CAREFUL SHIRTS, INC. , C & K LAUNDRY SYSTEMS, INC. , YONG W. KANG and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv06718
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCUSKER v. HIBU PLC et al
as 2:2014cv05670
Plaintiff:
JAMES McCUSKER
Defendant:
HIBU PLC , HIBU INC. , MIKE POCOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
