Cases 31 - 40 of 51
SPINA v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2012cv00408
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SPINA
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and BRIAN W. HARTZELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Derrick Brown v. Matt Rodarmel, et al
as 10-3758
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK LAKEITH BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
MATT RODARMEL, Case Manager, TYRONE WALLACE, Federal Informant, E STEWART, Lieutenant and others
Hartzell v. Sauers et al
as 1:2010cv01236
Petitioner:
Craig Hartzell
Respondent:
Ms. Debra Sauers and Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HARTZELL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv38076
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM R. HARTZELL
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A. P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Brown v. Rodarmel et al
as 3:2010cv00293
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lakeith Brown
Defendant:
Matt Rodarmel, Tyrone Wallace, E Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
HARTZELL v. AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv93845
Plaintiff:
ABRAHAM HARTZELL
Defendant:
AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. and GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HARTZELL v. CONGOLEUM CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv93875
Plaintiff:
ABRAHAM HARTZELL
Defendant:
CONGOLEUM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HARTZELL v. H. B. FULLER COMPANY
as 2:2009cv93919
Plaintiff:
ABRAHAM HARTZELL
Defendant:
H. B. FULLER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HARTZELL v. AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv93813
Plaintiff:
ABRAHAM HARTZELL
Defendant:
AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Keller v. Hartzel et al
as 3:2009cv02514
Plaintiff:
Christopher Keller and Christopher Keller
Defendant:
Michael Hartzel, John Stravinski, Craig Flynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
