Cases 31 - 40 of 66
STUTSY et al v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv63648
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROBERT STUTSY and LAVELLA CANNON STUTSY
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , GAF CORPORATION, OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRIFFIN et al v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv63852
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROBERT GRIFFIN and MARTHA ANN ATKINS
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , GAF CORPORATION , OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
SCOTT et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv61168
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROBERT SCOTT and MAXINE SCOTT
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , CROWN CORK & SEAL CO., INC. , KEENE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James Brooks v. David DiGuglielmo, et al
as 11-1074
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ROBERT BROOKS
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, DA BERKS and ATTY GEN PA
James Carter v. USA
as 10-3551
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ROBERT CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BROOKS v. BLASKO et al
as 2:2010cv03844
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROBERT BROOKS
Defendant:
BRANDY L. BLASKO, GARY A. OLINGER and MIKE WENEROWICZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2010mc00110
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROBERT CARTER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Petition for Review
Type:
Other Statutes
NOLAN v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv67404
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROBERT NOLAN
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION , WR GRACE & COMPANY , HK PORTER CO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LEYDIC
as 2:2010cv01513
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
JAMES ROBERT LEYDIC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
