Cases 31 - 40 of 134
BROWN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv01126
Plaintiff:
DAVID BROWN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JIM KENNY, MIRANDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. PHILADELPHIA COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 2:2018cv00009
Petitioner:
ROBERT R. WILLIAMS
Respondent:
PHILADELPHIA COUNTY SHERIFF, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, LARRY KRASNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS et al v. PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE et al
as 2:2017cv04484
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER R. WILLIAMS and GOVERNMENTS POLICE OF AND AUTHORITIES
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE and PHILADELPHIA PRISONS SYSTEMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Captain B. Taggart et al
as 1:2017cv01205
Plaintiff:
Jamie R. Williams
Defendant:
Captain B. Taggart, Warden David J. Ebbert, AW's Dental Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. Warden et al
as 1:2017cv01204
Plaintiff:
Jamie R. Williams
Defendant:
Warden, Missingman, Lt. Seaba and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KEEL v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2017cv02787
Petitioner:
JESSE LEE KEEL, III
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER COURTS, SETH R. WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
USA v. Julius Williams
as 17-2280
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
JULIUS R WILLIAMS
Williams v. Pennsylvania State Education Association
as 1:2016cv02529
Plaintiff:
James R. Williams
Defendant:
Pennsylvania State Education Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ENGLISH v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2016cv06480
Petitioner:
JAMES F. ENGLISH, III
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and SETH R. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HIMCHAK v. DYE et al
as 3:2016cv02436
Plaintiff:
William A. Himchak, III
Defendant:
Daniel Dye, CMNWLTH Of Pa - Pa State Police, Craig Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
