Cases 31 - 40 of 1,045
Luis Aguuilar Marquinez v. Dole Food Company Inc, et al
as 24-1312
Plaintiff:
LUIS ANTONIO AGUUILAR MARQUINEZ
Defendant:
DOLE FOOD COMPANY INC, DOLE FRESH FRUIT CO, STANDARD FRUIT COMPANY and others
USA v. Pedro Sanchez-LaPorte
as 24-1304
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
PEDRO SANCHEZ-LAPORTE
RAMOS RAMIREZ v. EMPIRE MANAGEMENT GROUP LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
MARIA RAMOS RAMIREZ
Defendant:
EMPIRE MANAGEMENT GROUP LLC, KALEH MOSTAFA and THERESA SANCHEZ MOSTAFA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
CASTILLO et al v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00661
Plaintiff:
ERASMO CASTILLO and ANA GUADALUPE SANCHEZ
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. doing business as UPS and CASEY P. ARNOLD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
SANCHEZ et al v. METLIFE, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv23073
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SANCHEZ and EDUARDO LUNA
Defendant:
METLIFE, INC., REFRESCO BEVERAGES US INC., ROSA VELAZQUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
SANCHEZ-BUITRAGO et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv00721
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO SANCHEZ-BUITRAGO and MARIA CIFUENTES-ALVAREZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Abraham Ituah v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 23-3140
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABRAHAM ITUAH
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JAMES J. ZWOLAK, BRENDAN J. PHILBIN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
