Cases 41 - 50 of 64
CARTWRIGHT v. FIDELITY BANK et al
as 2:2012cv01502
Plaintiff:
KAREN W. CARTWRIGHT
Defendant:
FIDELITY BANK , RICHARD SPENCER and ANTHONY ROCCO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
GREEN et al v. ADRENALINE FAMILY ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
as 1:2012cv05474
Plaintiff:
BONNIE GREEN and ROBERT CARTWRIGHT
Defendant:
ADRENALINE FAMILY ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CARTWRIGHT v. A-C PRODUT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv50862
Plaintiff:
EVA N. CARTWRIGHT
Defendant:
A-C PRODUT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Cartwright v. Zimmer Incorporated et al
as 2:2010cv06025
Plaintiff:
Charles Cartwright
Defendant:
Zimmer Incorporated and ZIMMER HOLDINGS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARTWRIGHT v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv80467
Plaintiff:
PETER CARTWRIGHT
Defendant:
AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY, COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARTWRIGHT v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv69996
Plaintiff:
EVA N. CARTWRIGHT
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARTWRIGHT v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv69995
Plaintiff:
EHLE N. CARTWRIGHT
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-2057
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
CARTWRIGHT v. ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC.
as 2:2009cv04389
Plaintiff:
CHARLES W. CARTWRIGHT
Defendant:
ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CARTWRIGHT v. CARTWRIGHT et al
as 2:2009cv74520
Plaintiff:
BOBBY E CARTWRIGHT, BOBBY E CARTWRIGHT, DELORES CARTWRIGHT and others
Defendant:
A. W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
