Cases 41 - 50 of 1,239
WALGREEN CO. et al v. CELGENE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2022cv06440
Plaintiff:
WALGREEN CO. and KROGER SPECIALTY PHARMACY, INC.
Defendant:
CELGENE CORPORATION, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, NATCO PHARMA LIMITED and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv05283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv06013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
BERNSTEIN v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO. et al
as 2:2021cv20452
Plaintiff:
HOWARD BERNSTEIN
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO., MARK J. ALLES, M.D. GIOVANNI CAFORIO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
MOLINA HEALTHCARE, INC. v. CELGENE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2022cv04561
Plaintiff:
MOLINA HEALTHCARE, INC.
Defendant:
CELGENE CORPORATION and BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Osbert Bristol v. Attorney General United States of America
as 22-2572
Petitioner:
OSBERT ALEXANDER BRISTOL
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY v. XSPRAY PHARMA AB
as 1:2022cv04328
Plaintiff:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Defendant:
XSPRAY PHARMA AB
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
USA v. Jack Bristol
as 22-2233
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JACK RUSSEL BRISTOL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
