Cases 41 - 50 of 249
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02613
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Abt v. Alvarez et al
as 1:2021cv00172
Defendant:
Cesar Conde, Michael T. Duke, James W. Breyer and others
Nominal Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Manuel Abt
CASH v. TICE et al
as 2:2020cv01304
Respondent:
ERIC TICE and THE PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER L. CASH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CASH v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv02811
Defendant:
JANE DOE, MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
LESLIE E.M. CASH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aronson v. Smith et al.
as 1:2020cv00587
Defendant:
William Norris Jennings, H. James Williams, James S. Ely, III and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Aronson
Nominal Defendant:
Community Health Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CASH v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2020cv04603
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, GLAXOSMITHKLINE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS (US) LLC, NOVARTIS CONSUMER HEALTH, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ROSEMARY CASH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disability Counseling Services, Inc., et al v. Complete Business Solutions Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01594
Plaintiff:
Dr. Phillip MacFarland and Disability Counseling Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Cash Cow Capital, LLC, Complete Business Solutions, Inc, EBF Partners, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CASH v. BOBAK et al
as 2:2020cv00110
Defendant:
ANDREW MERCER and SCOTT BOBAK
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER L. CASH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00377
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. ESPINAL et al
as 2:2019cv21616
Defendant:
EDWARD ESPINAL and CASH FLOW PARTNERS, LLC
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
