Cases 41 - 50 of 423
DULIK v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF GREENE COUNTY, et al
as 2:2021cv01071
Petitioner:
STEVEN T. DULIK, JR.
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF GREENE COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bradley v. PA Attorney General of the Commonwealth of PA et al
as 1:2021cv01294
Petitioner:
Tracey R. Bradley
Respondent:
PA Attorney General of the Commonwealth of PA and Warden York County Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nachmenson v. Commonwealth of PA
as 1:2021cv01084
Plaintiff:
Nachman Nachmenson
Defendant:
Commonwealth of PA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VIRGO v. SHABAZZ et al
as 5:2021cv02518
Defendant:
JOSEPH BIDEN, DOUG WILLIAMS, ALLENTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
VIRGILLIO VIRGO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Commonwealth of PA
as 4:2021cv00479
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D. Hill
Defendant:
Commonwealth of PA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TOMAINE v. Commonwealth of PA
as 1:2021cv00243
Respondent:
Commonwealth of PA and PA Attorney General
Petitioner:
ADAM MICHAEL TOMAINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Perez v. Farrell et al
as 3:2021cv00170
Defendant:
Correction Officer Jack Gilroy, Correction Officer Pete Zelensky, A. Rivera and others
Plaintiff:
Joan Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OWENS v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2020cv00369
Petitioner:
LQ5286 JAMES JOSEPH OWENS and JAMES JOSEPH OWENS
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Williams v. Commonwealth of PA et al
as 3:2020cv01738
Respondent:
Commonwealth of PA and PA Attorney General
Petitioner:
Sanford Williams, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
