Cases 41 - 50 of 133
GREEN v. CORZINE et al
as 3:2009cv01600
Plaintiff:
MATT GREEN
Defendant:
JON CORZINE, GEORGE HAYMAN, LYDELL SHERRER and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
REIFF v. ST. FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER et al
as 3:2009cv01524
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL REIFF
Defendant:
ST. FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER, DENNIS M. NUGENT, M.D., CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
AFDAHL v. CANCELLIERI et al
as 3:2009cv01332
Plaintiff:
THERESE AFDAHL
Defendant:
FRANK CANCELLIERI, KIESHA WILLIAMS, LOUIS COLELLA and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
KING v. SHERRER et al
as 2:2009cv00484
Plaintiff:
MARTE KING
Defendant:
LYDELL SHERRER, 1050 UNKNOWN STAFF, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ROBINSON v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICE et al
as 1:2009cv00134
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. ROBINSON
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICE, GEARLD PACKMAN, SCOTT WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
TORMASI v. HAYMAN et al
as 3:2008cv04950
Plaintiff:
WALTER A. TORMASI
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HAYMAN, JAMES BARBO, MICHELLE RICCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARBONARO v. LUTZ et al
as 1:2008cv04928
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH F. CARBONARO, JR.
Defendant:
LUTZ, ANDREW YOUNGBLOOD, ROBIN CLEMONS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
NYHOLM, 2ND v. PRYCE et al
as 1:2008cv04824
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. NYHOLM, 2ND
Defendant:
PRYCE, MEKENTCO, ROLLINS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WERNER v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES et al
as 3:2008cv04663
Plaintiff:
KEITH A. WERNER
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, ALLAN B. MARTIN, ABU AHSAN and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HASHER v. HAYMAN et al
as 2:2008cv04105
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HASHER
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HAYMAN, JENNIFER VELEZ, BERNARD GOODWIN and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
