Cases 41 - 50 of 594
HOLLAND v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT et al
as 2:2023cv02724
Plaintiff:
MARIE HOLLAND
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, CAPITAL REALTY GROUP, INC. doing business as PROSPECT PARK APARTMENTS CRG LLC, MOSHE EISCHLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US MED-EQUIP, LLC v. AGILITI, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv01252
Plaintiff:
US MED-EQUIP, LLC
Defendant:
AGILITI, INC. and DAVID HOLLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
HOLLAND v. PROGRESSIVE SPECIALITY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2023cv00910
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY, PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY and PROGRESSIVE SPECIALITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND HOLLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00846
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
HOLLAND II v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv00787
Plaintiff:
WALTER E HOLLAND II
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00986
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Joseph Campbell v. Board of Directors of Bryn Mawr Trust Co, et al
as 23-1034
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOSEPH CAMPBELL
Defendant:
BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF BRYN MAWR TRUST CO, DIEGO F. CALDERIN, MICHAEL J. CLEMENT and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ROYAL BANK SUPPLEMENT EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN
USA v. Djavon Holland
as 22-2937
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DJAVON HOLLAND
USA v. Harvey Holland
as 22-2764
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
HARVEY HOLLAND
USA v. Jeffrey Holland
as 22-2763
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JEFFREY HOLLAND
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
