Cases 41 - 50 of 130
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00677
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00115
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MEDINA-JIMENEZ et al v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv06033
Plaintiff:
FERMIN MEDINA-JIMENEZ and ADELAIDA MEDINA
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. , JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC , JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JIMENEZ v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv03747
Plaintiff:
MAGDALENA JIMENEZ
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, THOMAS LICIARDELLO , PERRY BETTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JIMENEZ v. OVERMYER et al
as 2:2016cv00975
Petitioner:
ENRIQUE JIMENEZ
Respondent:
MICHAEL D. OVERMYER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv06592
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208
MARTINEZ-JIMENEZ v. KOONS
as 5:2015cv06358
Plaintiff:
ELIEL MARTINEZ-JIMENEZ
Defendant:
RYAN KOONS and J. GLENNY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JIMENEZ v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2015cv05419
Plaintiff:
DAVID JIMENEZ
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA, M. FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JIMENEZ v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP.
as 2:2015cv05205
Plaintiff:
DANEZA JIMENEZ
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jimenez v. Comcast Corporation
as 3:2015cv01776
Plaintiff:
Katie Jimenez
Defendant:
Comcast Corporation
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
