Cases 41 - 50 of 67
DAVIS v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2018cv15247
Defendant:
INTERNAL AFFAIRS, WARDEN KAREN TAYLOR and NEW JERSEYS ESTATES
Plaintiff:
REGINAL LEE DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2018cv15242
Plaintiff:
REGINAL LEE DAVIS
Defendant:
WARDEN KAREN TAYLOR, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and OFFICIALS AU TOWNS HERE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VOIGTSBERGER v. ASCIONE et al
as 1:2018cv15016
Defendant:
NJ OAL JUDGE JOSEPH ASCIONE, FORMER NJ AG CHRISTOPHER PORRINO, PAMELA PULLMAN and others
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN VOIGTSBERGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHAW v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2018cv14144
Petitioner:
CURTIS SHAW
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and WARDEN KAREN TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ARCHER et al v. BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
as 2:2018cv00908
Plaintiff:
ROYCE ARCHER , DANIEL ARCHER , CHARLEEN PEREZ and others
Defendant:
BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOLLOWAY v. TAYLOR
as 1:2018cv02792
Petitioner:
STEVEN D. HOLLOWAY
Respondent:
KAREN TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LINNEN v. BEACHMAN et al
as 1:2017cv12647
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE LINNEN
Defendant:
BRENDA BEACHMAN, WARREN CAMPBELL, GREGG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLLOWAY v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2017cv11750
Petitioner:
STEVEN D HOLLOWAY
Respondent:
KAREN TAYLOR, RICHARD WELLS, PATRICIA TAULANE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TALBERT v. BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS et al
as 1:2017cv07717
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, CITY OF CAMDEN, DAVID OWEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANCHEZ v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2017cv07732
Petitioner:
JOSE A. SANCHEZ
Respondent:
KAREN TAYLOR and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
