Cases 41 - 50 of 114
Robinson v. Morris et al
as 1:2016cv00117
Plaintiff:
Eric Robinson
Defendant:
Sylvia Morris , Mindy Biser , Jay Whitesel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Wireman et al
as 1:2015cv02254
Plaintiff:
Greg Johnson
Defendant:
Darrell Wireman , Morris L. Houser , James Eckard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramzee v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2015cv02143
Plaintiff:
Myles Ramzee
Defendant:
John Wetzel , Shawn Kephart , Ulli Klemm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILDALGO v. PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2015cv00203
Plaintiff:
EFRAIN HILDALGO
Defendant:
PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, OVERMEYER, MCGOWEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROTKISKE et al v. KLEMM et al
as 2:2015cv03638
Plaintiff:
KEVIN ROTKISKE and JACQUELYNE ROTKISKE
Defendant:
PAUL KLEMM, NUDELMAN, KLEMM & GOLUB, P.C., NUDELMAN, NUDELMAN & ZIERING, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SLOAN v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2015cv00170
Plaintiff:
AARON SLOAN
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, ULLI KLEMM, FAITH AKDEMIR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kerry Marshall v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor, et al
as 15-1928
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KERRY X. MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ULLI KLEMM, Director of Bureau of Treatment Services and others
HALL v. KLEMM et al
as 1:2015cv00020
Plaintiff:
ERIC WILDCAT HALL
Defendant:
ULRICH KLEMM, SHAWN KEPHART, JOHN DUGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyrone Peele v. Ulli Klemm
as 14-4637
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE PEELE
Defendant - Appellee:
ULLI KLEMM
Russell Vance v. Ulli Klemm
as 14-4210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUSSELL LEE X. VANCE, also known as Abdullah Rasul Shabazz-Allah
Defendant - Appellee:
ULLI KLEMM, Religion Volunteer and Recreational Services "Program Administrator, In His Personal and Professional Capacity"
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
