Cases 41 - 50 of 102
Maloney v. Bradley et al
as 1:2019cv01783
Defendant:
W. Matthew Brown, Kevin Barner, Kyle S. Volluz and others
Plaintiff:
Nancy G. Maloney
Nominal Defendant:
Forterra, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Village Realty v. McPherson
as 1:2019cv01473
Defendant:
Michael McPherson
Plaintiff:
Village Realty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOBULA v. FELLOWSHIP SENIOR LIVING, INC. et al
as 3:2019cv15653
Defendant:
KEVIN MILLER, JOHN DOE, KEITH MCPHERSON and others
Plaintiff:
MARGARET BOBULA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
HICKS et al v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv09297
Plaintiff:
PHYLLIS VICARS, NEAL HAMILTON SR., JOHN GAMBRELL and others
Defendant:
JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, LLC, BAYER CORPORATION, BAYER HEALTHCARE AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HICKS et al v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv09297
Plaintiff:
PHYLLIS VICARS, NEAL HAMILTON SR., JOHN GAMBRELL and others
Defendant:
JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, LLC, BAYER CORPORATION, BAYER HEALTHCARE AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee v. Bradley et al
as 1:2019cv00089
Defendant:
W. Matthew Brown, Kevin Barner, Kyle S. Volluz and others
Plaintiff:
Maria Lee
MCPHERSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2018cv08563
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL L MCPHERSON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MCPHERSON v. SUPERINTENDENT VINCENT MOONEY et al
as 5:2018cv01689
Petitioner:
BRANDON L. MCPHERSON
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT VINCENT MOONEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCPHERSON v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2018cv05127
Plaintiff:
MELODY MCPHERSON
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
