Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Boyd v. Lisiak et al
as 3:2016cv01262
Plaintiff:
Stevie Boyd
Defendant:
John Lisiak, Haresh Pandya and Nelson Iannuzzi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buehl v. Harewood et al
as 3:2016cv00822
Plaintiff:
Roger Buehl
Defendant:
Adrian Harewood , Haresh Pandya , Vicki Stanishefski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tillery v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2016cv00235
Plaintiff:
Major George Tillery
Defendant:
John Wetzel, John Kerestes, Brenda Tritt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAKHANI et al v. PATEL et al
as 3:2015cv07794
Plaintiff:
NARENDRA LAKHANI , SONALI MODY and DARSHAN LAKHANI
Defendant:
ANIL PATEL, MANISH PATEL, RAJNI PATEL and others
Counter_claimant:
HARIT KAPADIA, CPA , PANDYA, KAPADIA & ASSOCIATES, CPA, PA and ASHWIN PANDYA, CPA
Counter_defendant:
DARSHAN LAKHANI , NARENDRA LAKHANI and SONALI MODY
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Vasquez v. Tritt et al
as 1:2015cv01877
Plaintiff:
Luis Vasquez
Defendant:
Brenda Tritt and Pandya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PANDYA v. PAONE
as 3:2015cv07055
Plaintiff:
TUHIN PANDYA
Defendant:
JOSEPH PAONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TRAVELODGE HOTELS, INC. v. OSP HOSPITALITY GROUP, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv03421
Plaintiff:
TRAVELODGE HOTELS, INC.
Defendant:
OSP HOSPITALITY GROUP, LLC, NICK VYAS, ANAD PATEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv08127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
PANDYA et al v. KORMAN et al
as 5:2014cv02304
Plaintiff:
UPEN A. PANDYA , MADHURI U. PANDYA , PURVA U. PANDYA and others
Defendant:
MILAN KORMAN , TCV, INC., TRANSWORKS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
