Cases 41 - 50 of 104
Hicks v. Graff et al
as 1:2014cv01879
Plaintiff:
James William Hicks, Jr.
Defendant:
Daniel H. Graff, David M. Whitcomb, Mark A. Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Dove v. County of York, et al
as 14-1440
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD A. DOVE
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF YORK and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Jimi Rose v. County of York, et al
as 13-4712
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIMI ROSE
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF YORK, COUNTY OF ADAMS, RICHARD K. RENN and others
Ronald Dove v. York County
as 13-4578
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD A. DOVE
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF YORK and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
In re: Ronald Dove
as 13-4234
Petitioner:
In re: RONALD A. DOVE
Respondent:
COUNTY OF YORK and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Nominal Respondent:
MALACHY E. MANNION
Murray v. Hnyda et al
as 4:2013cv02644
Plaintiff:
Glenn Asa Murray
Defendant:
Charles Robert Hnyda, Kim R. Hnyda-Waver, Surrogate's Court of Studen County New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gardner v. County of York et al
as 3:2013cv01569
Plaintiff:
Joseph Gardner
Defendant:
County of York, Mary Sabol, PrimeCare Medical, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shannon Mayo, Sr. v. County of York, et al
as 13-2027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHANNON L. MAYO, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
THE COUNTY OF YORK and PRIME CARE MEDICAL EMPLOYEES
Johnson v. Burns et al
as 1:2013cv00278
Petitioner:
Rodney Jermaine Johnson
Respondent:
Richard Burns, The District Attorney of the County of York and The Attorney General for the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
West v. County of York, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2012cv01564
Plaintiff:
Israel West
Defendant:
County of York, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, York County Prison, Mary Sabol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
