Cases 41 - 48 of 48
PANDURE v. RICCI et al
as 3:2010cv04426
Petitioner:
JAMIE PANDURE
Respondent:
MICHELLE RICCI and NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SHEIK WYSDOM ALI EL v. NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 3:2010cv00352
Petitioner:
SHEIK WYSDOM ALI EL
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL, MONMOUTH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, IRA KREIZMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALEXANDER v. WINSLOW TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION et al
as 1:2009cv05898
Plaintiff:
FREDDIE L. ALEXANDER
Defendant:
WINSLOW TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION, WINSLOW TOWNSHIP, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Chepito Hilton v. State of NJ, et al
as 09-1132
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHEPITO HILTON
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NJ, NJ STATE POL, JEFFREY KRONENFELD and others
TORRES v. TOWNSHIP OF NORTH BERGEN et al
as 2:2008cv05890
Plaintiff:
ALEXIS TORRES
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF NORTH BERGEN, TOWNSHIP OF NORTH BERG POLICE DEPARTMENT, THOMAS FARLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
MCGOWAN v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2008cv05841
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL G. MCGOWAN
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Patricia Fields v. USA, et al
as 08-2938
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICIA A. FIELDS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Non-Participating:
ANDREWS FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, ZULIMA FARBER, NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL and STATE OF NJ, DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES
COTA v. NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2007cv05550
Petitioner:
ARTHUR COTA
Respondent:
NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL and NEW YORK ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
