Cases 41 - 50 of 740,181
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00857
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00855
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
WILLIAMS v. WASHINGTON
as 1:2024cv00165
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS
Respondent:
WARDEN WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2024cv00166
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
BAEZ v. MCCULLOUGH et al
as 1:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN BAEZ
Defendant:
STACI M. MCCULLOUGH, JONATHAN MATSON and TWELVE JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HUNTER v. COMPASS GROUP USA, INC.
as 2:2024cv00856
Plaintiff:
FAYDRA HUNTER
Defendant:
COMPASS GROUP USA, INC. doing business as CHARTWELLS DINING SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act 1993 (FMLA)
LABORERS COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PA v. HUCKESTEIN MECHANICAL LLC
as 2:2024cv00853
Plaintiff:
LABORERS COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PA
Defendant:
HUCKESTEIN MECHANICAL LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1337 E.R.I.S.A.
Woodrow et al v. Doman et al
as 1:2024cv00970
Plaintiff:
Lacie Woodrow and Everett Meehling
Defendant:
Evangeline Doman and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409 Postal Service
Snyder v. Aldi Inc.
as 1:2024cv00971
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Snyder
Defendant:
Aldi Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Catalano v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. et al
as 3:2024cv00963
Plaintiff:
Philip Catalano
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., Walmart, Inc. and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
