Cases 51 - 60 of 225
Radick v. Potter et al
as 3:2016cv00850
Petitioner:
Luke Thomas Radick
Respondent:
J. Potter, Federal Detention Center, Philadelphia, Warden, J.L. Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SOP v. SMITH et al
as 2:2016cv01226
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE SOP
Defendant:
ALLAN C. SMITH, THE LAW FIRM OF ALLAN C. SMITH, PC, THE LAW FIRM OF RYAN E. CALEF & ASSOCIATES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MIKITA v. SMITH et al
as 2:2015cv06743
Plaintiff:
JOHN A. MIKITA
Defendant:
ALLAN C. SMITH, THE LAW FIRM OF ALLAN C. SMITH, PC, THE LAW FIRM OF RYAN E. CALEF & ASSOCIATES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
LOCKETT v. SMITH
as 2:2015cv01636
Petitioner:
TRAMALE LOCKETT
Respondent:
RICHARD C. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. DEPUY ORTHOPEDICS, INC. et al
as 5:2015cv06005
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM C. SMITH
Defendant:
DEPUY ORTHOPEDICS, INC., DEPUY, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON INTERNATIONAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chad Narduzzi v. Smith, et al
as 15-3441
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHAD C. NARDUZZI
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD C. SMITH, individually and in their official capacities
HIGGINS v. LAW FIRM OF ALLAN C. SMITH, P.C. et al
as 2:2015cv05473
Plaintiff:
AMANDA HIGGINS
Defendant:
LAW FIRM OF ALLAN C. SMITH, P.C., CACH, LLC and X,Y,Z CORPORATIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Lockett v. Smith et al
as 3:2015cv01843
Plaintiff:
Tramale Lockett
Defendant:
Delker, Woods, Kimberly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. SMITH et al
as 2:2015cv04760
Plaintiff:
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
DAVID C. SMITH, CHERYL V. PAJIL and DCS NIGHTLIFE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
