Cases 51 - 60 of 102
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv03846
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
CLEMENS v. WARDEN S.C.I. GREENE et al
as 2:2017cv02455
Petitioner:
LARRY D. CLEMENS
Respondent:
WARDEN S.C.I. GREENE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ________________ and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF _______________________
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brasure's Pest Control, Inc. v. Air Cleaning Equipment, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00330
Plaintiff:
Brasure's Pest Control, Inc.
Defendant:
Air Cleaning Equipment, Inc. , Robert Clemens and Kevin Yow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brasure's Pest Control, Inc. v. Air Cleaning Equipment, Inc. et al.
as 1:2017cv00323
Plaintiff:
Brasure's Pest Control, Inc.
Defendant:
Air Cleaning Equipment, Inc. , Robert Clemens and Kevin Yow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLEMENS v. SEE
as 5:2017cv01173
Plaintiff:
JULIA CLEMENS
Defendant:
ROGER SEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLEMENS v. WARDEN SCI GREENE et al
as 2:2016cv04820
Plaintiff:
LARRY DELROY CLEMENS
Defendant:
WARDEN SCI GREENE, WARDEN SCI GRATERFORD, WARDEN SCI CAMP HILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURGIS et al v. BAYER CORP., et al
as 2:2016cv03589
Plaintiff:
MANDY BURGIS , AMANDA BURLESON , NATASHA BURNS and others
Defendant:
BAYER CORP. , BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC , BAYER ESSURE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CLEMENS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv02513
Petitioner:
CHARLES CLEMENS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MCKENNA v. MIGNELLA et al
as 5:2016cv01017
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW D. MCKENNA
Defendant:
ANTHONY J. MIGNELLA, MICHAEL SHALE, TIMOTHY VANHISE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FREDERICKS-CLEMENS v. COLVIN
as 5:2016cv00065
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY ARLENE FREDERICKS-CLEMENS
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
