Cases 51 - 60 of 275
Cheng v. The Department of Justice et al
as 3:2020cv00260
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security and The Department of Justice
Plaintiff:
Zhilong Cheng
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
O'BRIEN v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 2:2020cv00092
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. O'BRIEN, III
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv02152
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HILL-JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 2:2019cv01391
Defendant:
CHRISTY FOREMAN, STEPHEN BEGLER, UNKNOWN ATF AGENT and others
Plaintiff:
DACLON HILL-JOHNSON and DAELON HILL-JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
CARROLL v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 2:2019cv03568
Plaintiff:
WESLEY CARROLL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
BURMAN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS DIRECTOR et al
as 3:2019cv00123
Plaintiff:
ALLAH BURMAN
Defendant:
KOPERA MEDICAL STAFF, ERIC BRADLEY, IAN CONNORS and others
Petitioner:
DONALD N. DAVEY and TIMICO C. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv02905
Defendant:
THE WASHINGTON POST NEWS PAPER, THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEDERAL CIRCUIT, ATTORNEY DAVID BARRISH and others
Plaintiff:
KIETH DAVIS and KEITH DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. HORNAK et al
as 2:2019cv00509
Respondent:
HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH, SCOTT BRADY, AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
FITZGERALD v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 2:2019cv01385
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Petitioner:
HAROLD FITZGERALD, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
O'BRIEN v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 2:2019cv01262
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM O'BRIEN
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
