Cases 51 - 60 of 244
McMahon v. Saul
as 1:2020cv01320
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Scott Andrew McMahon, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
DEMOYA v. MCMAHON et al
as 1:2020cv01281
Plaintiff:
Joaquin Demoya
Defendant:
Automotive Remarketing Group doing business as Americas Auto Auction and Dennis Mcmahon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harrell v. Grady et al
as 1:2020cv01156
Defendant:
C. Fox, Morris Houser, A. Moscatto and others
Plaintiff:
Tre Harrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Naranjo v. Walter et al
as 1:2020cv00918
Defendant:
T. Miller, M. Houser, C.O. Weller and others
Plaintiff:
Isaac Naranjo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pew v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2020cv00668
Defendant:
Shawn P Kenny, Dorina Varner, Phillips and others
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Percy Pew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEMOYA v. MCMAHON et al
as 5:2020cv01609
Plaintiff:
JOAQUIN DEMOYA
Defendant:
AUTOMOTIVE REMARKETING GROUP and DENNIS MCMAHON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mohammad Saleem v. Brungart, et al
as 20-1610
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK GARMAN, Superintendent, JOSEPH DUPONT, Chief Hearing Examiner's Office, G. MCMAHON, Deputy Superintendent and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOHAMMAD SOHAIL SALEEM
HARLEYSVILLE INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. PRINCE LAW OFFICES, P.C. et al
as 5:2020cv01083
Defendant:
PRINCE LAW OFFICES, P.C., SEAN MCMAHON, JOSHUA PRINCE and others
Plaintiff:
HARLEYSVILLE WORCESTER INSURANCE COMPANY and HARLEYSVILLE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Evenson et al v. Monsanto Company
as 1:2019cv02226
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Plaintiff:
Karen Sobray, Elizabeth Kaiser, Randell Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCMAHON et al v. ROCKWELL TACTICAL GROUP, LLC et al
as 5:2019cv05292
Defendant:
PRINCE LAW OFFICES, P.C., JOSHUA PRINCE, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
SEAN MCMAHON, TIFFANY MCMAHON and DARIN MCMAHON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
