Cases 51 - 60 of 236
ROBICHAW v. MCGEE et al
as 2:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
RENALDO M. ROBICHAW
Defendant:
SEAN P. MCGEE, MARK S. MURRAY, GARY CHESNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ST CLAIR v. FAYETTE COUNTY PRISON et al
as 2:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
CHAD E STCLAIR and CHAD E. ST. CLAIR
Defendant:
FAYETTE COUNTY PRISON and PRIME CARE MEDICAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCAULLEY v. CAMBRIA COUNTY PRISON et al
as 3:2022cv00002
Plaintiff:
DAVID MCCAULLEY
Defendant:
CAMBRIA COUNTY PRISON and PRIME CARE MEDICAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JOHNAKIN et al v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL et al
as 5:2021cv05366
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JOHNAKIN and CHRIS YOUNG
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL, BERKS COUNTY JAIL SYSTEM, WARDEN JEFFERY SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBICHAW v. MCGEE et al
as 2:2021cv05282
Plaintiff:
RENALDO M. ROBICHAW
Defendant:
SEAN P. MCGEE, JOSEPH M. LYNCH, PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JEWELL v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC.
as 2:2021cv04995
Plaintiff:
BRIAN JEWELL
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRENKE v. HOWSARE et al
as 3:2021cv00165
Plaintiff:
SHAWN GRENKE
Defendant:
ERIN HOWSARE, DENNIS VOUGHT, VARSHA PANDYA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Jonah Germany v. Warden Dauphin County Jail, et al
as 21-2538
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONAH GERMANY
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN DAUPHIN COUNTY JAIL and MIKE BOND, CEO of Prime Care Medical
MCCAULLEY v. CAMBRIA COUNTY PRISON et al
as 3:2021cv00128
Plaintiff:
DAVID MCCAULLEY
Defendant:
CAMBRIA COUNTY PRISON and PRIME CARE MEDICAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HISEL v. LAWRENCE COUNTY CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv00935
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M. HISEL
Defendant:
LAWRENCE COUNTY CORRECTIONS and PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
