Cases 51 - 60 of 358
MATOS v. PRISON HEALTH SERVICES INC. et al
as 2:2014cv04517
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MATOS
Defendant:
PRISON HEALTH SERVICES INC. and MENTAL HEALTH MANAGEMENT INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2014cv00200
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVIS
Defendant:
MICHAEL OVERMYER, MURIN, MONGELLUZZO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Soto v. Prison Health Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01183
Plaintiff:
Jean Soto
Defendant:
Prison Health Services, Inc., Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and Lisiak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOYD v. CITY OF PHILA. et al
as 2:2014cv03764
Plaintiff:
DARNELL BOYD
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA., NUTTER, PPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADEBAYO v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv03394
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, NUTTER, PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM and others
Plaintiff:
SAHEED ADEBAYO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: In Re: Alton Brown, et al
as 14-2922
Petitioner:
In re: ALTON D. BROWN
Respondent:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DORINA VARNER, WILLIAM BANTA and others
Nominal Respondent:
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO
ALWAN v. GIALA et al
as 2:2014cv02951
Plaintiff:
RASHEED ALWAN
Defendant:
LOUIS GIALA, MICHELLE FARRELL and THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA PRISON HEALTH SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUNSIL v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2014cv02383
Plaintiff:
BARRETT S. TUNSIL
Defendant:
FARRELL, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES/CORIZON, NUTTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TIMMS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv02236
Plaintiff:
ROBERT TIMMS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, NUTTER, PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry Washington v. Warden Greene SCI, et al
as 14-1880
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY UNSELD WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN GREENE SCI, JIN BYUNCHAK, Doctor, SCI-Greene, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES INC, ("PHS") PA. Doc. Health Care Providers and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
