Cases 51 - 59 of 59
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-2721
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
HOLCOMBE et al v. QUEST DIAGNOSTICS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv00570
Plaintiff:
MARY HOLCOMBE and RICHARD HOLCOMBE
Defendant:
QUEST DIAGNOSTICS, INC. and QUEST DIAGNOSTICS OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Lorie Garlick v. Quest Diagnostics Inc
as 08-1079
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LORIE GARLICK, TINA L. SCHROEDER, JOY SCOTT and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NATL MED SER INC, DBA NMS Labs, LABCORP, FIRSTLAB, a Subsidiary of FHC Health Systems Inc and others
BROD et al v. QUEST DIAGNOSTICS, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv03258
Plaintiff:
GARY R. BROD, GARY R. BROD, MARCIA A. BROD and others
Defendant:
QUEST DIAGNOSTICS, INC., QUEST DIAGNOSTICS, INC., QUEST DIAGNOSTIC CLINICAL LABORATORIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02501
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02470
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
QUEST DIAGNOSTICS, INC. v. KIESCHE
as 2:2007cv00748
Plaintiff:
QUEST DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
Defendant:
BRIAN KIESCHE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
AGOSTINO et al v. QUEST DIAGNOSTICS,INC. et al
as 2:2004cv04362
Plaintiff:
DENISE AGOSTINO , ROCCO AGOSTINO , JENNIFER HALEY and others
Defendant:
QUEST DIAGNOSTICS,INC. , AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLECTION AGENCY , DOES 1 TO 50 and others
Movant:
AGENCY OF CREDIT CONTROL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
