Cases 51 - 60 of 72
RIDDICK v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv32270
Plaintiff:
BOBBY L. RIDDICK
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
RIDDICK v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv30928
Plaintiff:
GILBERT E. RIDDICK
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
RIDDICK v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv30929
Plaintiff:
KEITH R. RIDDICK
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
RIDDICK v. WARDEN (NAME UNKNOWN) et al
as 2:2010cv05284
Plaintiff:
ELLISWORTH RIDDICK
Defendant:
WARDEN (NAME UNKNOWN), FEDERAL DETENTION CENTER, MANZI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Harry Riddick, Jr.
as 10-3697
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
HARRY LEE RIDDICK, JR.
RIDDICK v. CORZINE
as 2:2010cv02514
Plaintiff:
DERRELL RIDDICK
Defendant:
JON CORZINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIDDICK v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv33770
Plaintiff:
KEITH R. RIDDICK
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
RIDDICK v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv33769
Plaintiff:
BOBBY L. RIDDICK
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BRIDGERS v. ACANDS INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2009cv93179
Plaintiff:
RIDDICK M. BRIDGERS and RIDDICK M. BRIDGERS
Defendant:
ACANDS INCORPORATED, ARMSTRONG WORLD, ARMSTRONG WORLD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
RIDDICK v. GENERAL ELECTRIC CO et al
as 2:2009cv91511
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH RIDDICK, JOSEPH RIDDICK and JOSEPH RIDDICK
Defendant:
GENERAL ELECTRIC CO, GENERAL ELECTRIC CO, BUFFALO PUMPS INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
