Cases 51 - 60 of 294
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1255 Failure USCIS To Adjudicate Permanent Residency Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Omar Espinal, et al v. Bobs Discount Furniture LLC, et al
as 23-8003
Respondent:
OMAR A. ESPINAL, OSCAR RENE CALDERON-ROMERO, WELLINGTON TORRES and others
Petitioner:
BOBS DISCOUNT FURNITURE LLC and RXO LAST MILE INC
Angelica Pena Romero v. Attorney General United States of America
as 23-1254
Petitioner:
ANGELICA MARIA PENA ROMERO
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
ROMERO v. GONZALEZ et al
as 2:2023cv00388
Plaintiff:
ANJEANNINE R. ROMERO
Defendant:
YOLANDA GONZALEZ, RAY SHEMBRI, ANTHONY DESILVA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROMERO et al v. INTERSTATE COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
CARMEN ROMERO and ERIC WRIGHT
Defendant:
INTERSTATE COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE, INC., STARBUCKS CORPORATION, SDi LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
