Cases 51 - 60 of 1,600
Ronald Rothman v. Cabana Series IV Trust, et al
as 23-2455
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD S. ROTHMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
CABANA SERIES IV TRUST, IGLOO SERIES IV TRUST, US BANK TRUST NA, as Trustee and others
ABDI v. WELLS FARGO BANK N.A.
as 2:2023cv07163
Plaintiff:
ALI ABDI
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK N.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
GARCIA v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. et al
as 2:2023cv04244
Plaintiff:
JUAN F. GARCIA
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and PAYPAL INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. v. TAYLOR
as 2:2023cv03003
Plaintiff:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Defendant:
DON TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Action for Interplea
JOHNSON v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
as 2:2023cv03091
Plaintiff:
TARANI A JOHNSON
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Thomas Gage v. Wells Fargo Bank NA AS, et al
as 23-2320
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS I. GAGE
Defendant / Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK NA AS and FRANK J. PROVENZANO, Somerset County Sheriff
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Banning et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et. al. et al
as 1:2023cv00763
Plaintiff:
Sarita M. Banning and William C. Banning Jr.
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et. al., Secretary of Veterans Affairs and An Officer of the United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
