Cases 61 - 70 of 109
SHERMAN v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. et al
as 3:2017cv04132
Plaintiff:
DAN M. SHERMAN
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SURINA et al v. THE SOUTH RIVER BOARD OF EDUCATION et al
as 3:2017cv02173
Plaintiff:
TRICIA SURINA and JAMES D. SURINA
Defendant:
THE SOUTH RIVER BOARD OF EDUCATION, MICHAEL PFISTER, ROBERT PRUCHNIK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DANAHAR v. HMS HOLDINGS CORP. et al
as 3:2017cv01494
Plaintiff:
MARY DANAHAR
Defendant:
HMS HOLDINGS CORP., WILLIAM C. LUCIA and JEFFREY S. SHERMAN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
SHERMAN v. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS et al
as 3:2017cv00417
Plaintiff:
PEGGY SHERMAN
Defendant:
HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS and STRYKER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Freeman et al v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv09258
Plaintiff:
Brenda Freeman , Cynthia Acker , Mary Acosta and others
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC , JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC , Janssen Ortho LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOVETT SHERMAN v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv07857
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM D. LOVETT SHERMAN
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHERMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2016cv03760
Petitioner:
ROLAND SHERMAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MUMME v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv02203
Plaintiff:
SHERMAN MUMME
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
