Cases 61 - 70 of 6,417
SACKS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv06378
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SACKS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
BANKS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv00757
Plaintiff:
JOHANNA BANKS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Martin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00539
Plaintiff:
Tricia S. Martin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
DAI v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv06321
Plaintiff:
ADRIENNE DAI
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
SHORTLIDGE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv06334
Plaintiff:
JACQUELYN E SHORTLIDGE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
SPOSARO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv02182
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS JUSTIN SPOSARO
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
HIGGINBOTHAM v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv04616
Plaintiff:
MARK HIGGINBOTHAM
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
WARD v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv04556
Plaintiff:
RATYEEMAH WARD
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
EVANS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY et al
as 2:2024cv01360
Plaintiff:
CARL EVANS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coleman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv01448
Plaintiff:
Rashida Coleman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
