Cases 61 - 70 of 70
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02421
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1158
MAKARA v. BARR et al
as 2:2019cv00593
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, WILLIAM P. BARR, THOMAS E. BRANDON and others
Plaintiff:
THEODORE A. MAKARA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
CUEVA v. BARR et al
as 2:2019cv00381
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, WILLIAM PELHAM BARR, THOMAS E. BRANDON and others
Plaintiff:
MOE G. CUEVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lisa Folajtar v. Jeff Sessions, et al
as 19-1687
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, DIRECTOR OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THOMAS E. BRANDON, ACTING DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS, AND EXPLOSIVES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LISA M. FOLAJTAR
WEST v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2019cv00147
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY M.A. WEST
Defendant:
MEGAN J. BRENNAN, ABOLADE AKOMOLEDE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOLAJTAR v. SESSIONS et al
as 5:2018cv02717
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, THOMAS E. BRANDON and others
Plaintiff:
LISA M. FOLAJTAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CATERBONE v. LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE et al
as 5:2018cv02710
Defendant:
MIKE GEESEY, ABIGAL PFLUMM, ASHLEY BLAKE and others
Plaintiff:
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LUNCINSKI v. SESSIONS et al
as 2:2018cv00237
Plaintiff:
VICTOR M. LUNCINSKI
Defendant:
JEFFERSON BEAUREGARD SESSIONS, III, THOMAS E. BRANDON, CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv05386
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
