Cases 61 - 70 of 406
MENDY v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv00135
Defendant:
DOES 1 THROUGH 10, ABC INSURANCE COMPANY, HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD B. MENDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MENDY v. ACCOLEND, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00330
Defendant:
ACCOLEND, LLC, DOES 1 THROUGH 10, GBCAP FUND MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD B. MENDY, Nia Mendy and Palmetto Construction Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
LASCHE et al v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2018cv17552
Defendant:
KATIE EPPERLY, MARY LIPPENCOT, KYLE HIGGINS and others
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER LASCHE and MICHAEL LASCHE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv17258
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
MALHAN v. KATZ, et al
as 2:2018cv16404
Plaintiff:
CAPT. SURENDER MALHAN and SURENDER MALHAN
Defendant:
DAVID KATZ and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDRICOLA et al v. GANG et al
as 1:2018cv16339
Defendant:
MELVIN GANG and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 10
Plaintiff:
VANESSA ANDRICOLA and JEFFREY N ANDRICOLA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SCHEPISI et al v. SANTANDER BANK, N.A. et al
as 2:2018cv15006
Plaintiff:
LAURA SCHEPISI and MARK SCHEPISI
Defendant:
SANTANDER BANK, N.A., PHH MORTGAGE, JOHN AND JANE DOES 1 THROUGH 10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv14812
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SADOWSKI v. AMERICAN SECURITY TODAY LLC et al
as 3:2018cv14466
Defendant:
AMERICAN SECURITY TODAY LLC and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SADOWSKI
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
SADOWSKI v. L JIMENEZ ENTERPRISES CORP.
as 2:2018cv14291
Defendant:
L Jimenez Enterprises Corp., DOES 1 through 10 inclusive, DOES 1 THROUGH 10 and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sadowski
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
